Should he stay or should he go ?
#1
Posted 13 August 2009 - 06:11 PM
He's apparently not got long to live.
He was convicted over the Lockerbie bombing - it has already been conceded that he has grounds for appeal and this is ongoing but it is thought he will not live long enough to see it through.
Whilst no decision has yet been released it would seem quite likely that he may be released on compassionate grounds. The final decision lies with Scotland's Justice Secretary - Kenny MacAskill.
The American State Dept has just said that he should serve his sentence and this would seem to be in line with the views of the relatives of American victims.
Does al-Megrahi deserve any more compassion than what he showed for the ones he is convicted of killing?
Does he deserve any more compassion than other murderers such as Myra Hindley who were never released?
#2
Posted 13 August 2009 - 06:30 PM
A moral dilemma.
He's apparently not got long to live.
He was convicted over the Lockerbie bombing - it has already been conceded that he has grounds for appeal and this is ongoing but it is thought he will not live long enough to see it through.
Whilst no decision has yet been released it would seem quite likely that he may be released on compassionate grounds. The final decision lies with Scotland's Justice Secretary - Kenny MacAskill.
The American State Dept has just said that he should serve his sentence and this would seem to be in line with the views of the relatives of American victims.
Does al-Megrahi deserve any more compassion than what he showed for the ones he is convicted of killing?
Does he deserve any more compassion than other murderers such as Myra Hindley who were never released?
A quite dreadful miscarraige of British justice; it was that bad I thought he was Irish
'Fiat justitia ruat caelum'
#3
Posted 13 August 2009 - 06:32 PM
Crivvens - so many agendas on this forumA quite dreadful miscarraige of British justice; it was that bad I thought he was Irish
#4
Posted 13 August 2009 - 07:13 PM
Crivvens - so many agendas on this forum
Agendas??? Just stating facts.
'Fiat justitia ruat caelum'
#5
Posted 13 August 2009 - 07:17 PM
A moral dilemma.
He's apparently not got long to live.
He was convicted over the Lockerbie bombing - it has already been conceded that he has grounds for appeal and this is ongoing but it is thought he will not live long enough to see it through.
Whilst no decision has yet been released it would seem quite likely that he may be released on compassionate grounds. The final decision lies with Scotland's Justice Secretary - Kenny MacAskill.
The American State Dept has just said that he should serve his sentence and this would seem to be in line with the views of the relatives of American victims.
Does al-Megrahi deserve any more compassion than what he showed for the ones he is convicted of killing?
Does he deserve any more compassion than other murderers such as Myra Hindley who were never released?
A moral dilemma indeed, TomT.
Feelings run high on the issue; already today I've heard people say that if his family want to be near him, then they should come to Scotland. That of course on Real Radio in a cab this morning
My own view's a tad less harsh. What purpose is served by keeping a dying man in prison?
He's hardly going to be a danger to the public.
Especially if there's reasonable grounds to appeal against his conviction. If there's even the smallest chance that his conviction was unsafe then I personally think he should be released if the medics confirm he's not long for the world. Did Myra Hindley have reasonable grounds to appeal, anyone know?
Though if anyone I knew had been a victim of Lockerbie I might have an understandably more subjective view...although I'd be interested to know if Jim Swire has given a view on this, as the foremost campaigner for the truth in this case.
If the US system of long sentences/ultimate revenge/death row etc worked as a deterrent by giving out a message, then fair play. I'm just not sure it does
What do you guys think? Are our national characteristics for compassion and fair play being played on in this case?
#6
Posted 13 August 2009 - 07:32 PM
The point is you mention Irish - like they were the only one's who've suffered miscarriages of justice.Agendas??? Just stating facts.
There are scores of examples where British citizens and no doubt other nationalities have suffered miscarriages of justice.
#7
Posted 13 August 2009 - 07:41 PM
I shot from the lip with this one. Not exactly the same scenario because she died from a heart attack - so didn't have the prognosis of only months to live. However, there were numerous attempts to get parole - but it was made fairly clear she was never going to be released......
Did Myra Hindley have reasonable grounds to appeal, anyone know?
....
I agree with your views on Megrahi.
#8
Posted 13 August 2009 - 07:42 PM
The point is you mention Irish - like they were the only one's who've suffered miscarriages of justice.
There are scores of examples where British citizens and no doubt other nationalities have suffered miscarriages of justice.
Not quite to the same extent, Tom; Ibelieve the West Midland's Serious Crime Squad had a penchant for such miscarraiges. However, this is sidetracking from the thread which was Megrahi.
It appears he has enough additional evidence for an appeal but just won't live long enough to see it through. I understand the UK victims family Group have been campaigning on his behalf.
'Fiat justitia ruat caelum'
#9
Posted 13 August 2009 - 08:43 PM
Though if anyone I knew had been a victim of Lockerbie I might have an understandably more subjective view...although I'd be interested to know if Jim Swire has given a view on this, as the foremost campaigner for the truth in this case.
Latest from BBC news;
However, Jim Swire, who is also the father of a victim, said he had never been convinced that Megrahi had carried out the bombing.
"The sooner he is back with his family, the better," he said.
"On reasonable human grounds it is the right thing to do.
"If it's true that he is to be returned on compassionate grounds, then that would be more to Scotland's credit than returning him under the prison transfer agreement."
Sure, many will disagree with this view.
If you were Kenny McAskill, what would you do?
#10
Posted 13 August 2009 - 09:50 PM
I have read and still have a copy of the Jim Swire report; am a believer and think that the man should be released.
tam
#11
Posted 13 August 2009 - 10:49 PM
If his guilt was in no doubt whatsoever, then my opinon would be different. No form of illness, regardless of the nature, should ever be seen as a reason for releasing a soundly convicted criminal.
Which makes me think there may be a whole new thread in the Ronnie Biggs issue, rather than take this thread off in another direction.
As for Megrahi, if he is falsley imprisoned, then that is sad - on two fronts. Not only has that man served all these years unjustly, but the real perpetrators are still free.
#12
Posted 14 August 2009 - 07:17 AM
Despite ra tragedy of losin his daughter he still seeks justice, not revenge, he wants the real criminals brought tae justice not jist ra polikilly expedient
#13
Posted 14 August 2009 - 02:21 PM
My own view's a tad less harsh. What purpose is served by keeping a dying man in prison?
He's hardly going to be a danger to the public.
Not so much a matter of danger to the public, but any release on these grounds can be used as propaganda against us by terrorist forces. "Home to die, he was innocent all along says grief stricken Mother " etc etc etc ... subversion is the secondary gain in this particual play .
The whole point of the appeals - which cost a fortune is to drain resources and create a doubt which in turn goes to the advantage of the manipulative terrorist.
the rockin' world go round.
But you have absolutely
bastarded my couch.
#14
Posted 14 August 2009 - 02:29 PM
#15
Guest_westtender_*
Posted 14 August 2009 - 03:49 PM
Made some interesting points about the poor bewildered American families.... sold a pup by successive American political vested interests. This is easily done, when people are desperately seeking their 'closure'.
#16
Posted 14 August 2009 - 04:36 PM
Not so much a matter of danger to the public, but any release on these grounds can be used as propaganda against us by terrorist forces. "Home to die, he was innocent all along says grief stricken Mother " etc etc etc ... subversion is the secondary gain in this particual play .
The whole point of the appeals - which cost a fortune is to drain resources and create a doubt which in turn goes to the advantage of the manipulative terrorist.
Ah tend, before judjin and probably efterwards tae, that wan man's terrorist is anithurs freedom fighter
#17
Posted 14 August 2009 - 06:21 PM
Not so much a matter of danger to the public, but any release on these grounds can be used as propaganda against us by terrorist forces. "Home to die, he was innocent all along says grief stricken Mother " etc etc etc ... subversion is the secondary gain in this particual play .
The whole point of the appeals - which cost a fortune is to drain resources and create a doubt which in turn goes to the advantage of the manipulative terrorist.
I know what you're saying, LG, but I think the use of propaganda is actually less of an issue than the really overarching fact that this man may well have been wrongly convicted by the Scottish justice system. (And I've no doubt Britain is not above making political capital out of a British person possibly having been wrongly convicted in another country...)
That the appeal's been dropped seems pretty odd, and maybe darned convenient for some.
Kenny McAskill's said the appeal being dropped and the ongoing process to decide whether to release him are two separate issues. Are we finding that credible?
As it is, the man's likely to be released next week with a significant measure of doubt re his guilt. Hardly a fair outcome for him, his family, the families of the deceased and the rest of us.
#18
Posted 14 August 2009 - 06:25 PM
the rockin' world go round.
But you have absolutely
bastarded my couch.
#19
Posted 14 August 2009 - 06:27 PM
......
That the appeal's been dropped seems pretty odd, and maybe darned convenient for some.
Kenny McAskill's said the appeal being dropped and the ongoing process to decide whether to release him are two separate issues. Are we finding that credible?
......
...reekin of stinky fish - especially if he eventually gets released on humanitarion grounds.
It seems a device to ensure that this goes into the long grass for a very long time.
#20
Posted 14 August 2009 - 09:44 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users









